Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Peak Oil Peaking?


What is it about the Fall? I'm looking forward to Thanksgiving with friends and the rest of the world seems determined to pile on the bad news. North and South Korea trade shots at sea, New York State seems ready to follow California into a State of Bankruptcy and an official at the International Energy Agency tells the British Guardian newspaper we are running out of affordable, easily mined oil faster than our leaders want us to know... Commentators are now asking if we already for $6 a gallon gas in the US. Short answer to that is No! as embarrassing as that is to admit- we are too poor just now. This is what the Guardian was reporting yesterday in London in reference to the IEA report out today, bearing in mind the world currently uses around 82 million barrels per day as best as they can tell us:




Terry Macalister guardian.co.uk, Monday 9 November 2009 21.30 GMT Article history



The world is much closer to running out of oil than official estimates admit, according to a whistleblower at the International Energy Agency who claims it has been deliberately underplaying a looming shortage for fear of triggering panic buying.

The senior official claims the US has played an influential role in encouraging the watchdog to underplay the rate of decline from existing oil fields while overplaying the chances of finding new reserves.

The allegations raise serious questions about the accuracy of the organisation's latest World Energy Outlook on oil demand and supply to be published tomorrow – which is used by the British and many other governments to help guide their wider energy and climate change policies.


'There's suspicion the IEA has been influenced by the US. In particular they question the prediction in the last World Economic Outlook, believed to be repeated again this year, that oil production can be raised from its current level of 83m barrels a day to 105m barrels. External critics have frequently argued that this cannot be substantiated by firm evidence and say the world has already passed its peak in oil production.

Now the "peak oil" theory is gaining support at the heart of the global energy establishment. "The IEA in 2005 was predicting oil supplies could rise as high as 120m barrels a day by 2030 although it was forced to reduce this gradually to 116m and then 105m last year," said the IEA source, who was unwilling to be identified for fear of reprisals inside the industry. "The 120m figure always was nonsense but even today's number is much higher than can be justified and the IEA knows this.

"Many inside the organisation believe that maintaining oil supplies at even 90m to 95m barrels a day would be impossible but there are fears that panic could spread on the financial markets if the figures were brought down further. And the Americans fear the end of oil supremacy because it would threaten their power over access to oil resources," he added.

A second senior IEA source, who has now left but was also unwilling to give his name, said a key rule at the organisation was that it was "imperative not to anger the Americans" but the fact was that there was not as much oil in the world as had been admitted. "We have [already] entered the 'peak oil' zone. I think that the situation is really bad," he added.

The IEA acknowledges the importance of its own figures, boasting on its website: "The IEA governments and industry from all across the globe have come to rely on the World Energy Outlook to provide a consistent basis on which they can formulate policies and design business plans."


4 comments:

cpa3485 said...

The contrarian in me says that buying energy stocks might be good now.
Another real problem, in my opinion, is refining capacity. No new refineries have been built in the US for 30 years now, and they are extremely expensive to build. No matter what the production levels of crude oil may be, the refining capacity is far short of handling much of an increase.

Conchscooter said...

You're not being a contrarian, thats the unfortunate thing. Oil is a finite resource and we are running out of easily accessible, cheap oil. Refineries cost money, pumping oil costs money, especially when the oil is under two miles of ocean and five miles of rock ( Brazil's new giant offshore field). I don't think gaoline from that field will be sold in the US at $3 a gallon.
Hubbert's Peak has been debated for decades but when the IEA admits they've been fudging the numbers there is cause for concern.

Anonymous said...

FYI:

free documentary on line:

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/a-crude-awakening-the-oil-crash/

Conchscooter said...

Yup. Saudi Arabia won't say what it's reserves are and now the IEA is calling itself a liar? I have the nagging feeling perhaps it's best they keep the truth from us, we aren't at our best as a species when facing a crisis.