Our Dear Leader is holding a summit to discuss how top reduce the dire unemployment figures in our country. He's got business people, academics, economists and union members all sitting around figuring out how to reduce unemployment. It's a conundrum isn't it, how to reduce unemployment? After all unemployment wrecks lives, wrecks election prospects and makes us all look bad. Australia hasn't even had a recession, those nasty socialists with their well regulated banks and socialized medicine. Italy has had gruesome budget deficits for decades and yet look how well Italians live. Of course they are hemmed in by government regulations and lack of prospects but they get free health care and free education so I suppose it's not all bad for them either.Here in the land of the free and the home of the brave we are enjoying 10.2 percent official unemployment with new numbers out tomorrow. Official unemployment and under employment stand at 17.5 percent and unofficial unofficial estimates of people who've just given up and are scrounging indicate we may well be past the twenty percent mark. Now it used to be said that a country was in a Depression if unemployment reached 25%, because there is no official measure of an economic depression. A recession is measured by "negative economic activity" and we've been doing a fair bit of that the past year. Lately we saw a slight upward blip thanks to the cash for clunkers program so we are officially out of Recession, even though unemployment is nudging Depression levels.
What's more you need to be brave to be unemployed in these United States, because unlike our down trodden friends in the socialist states of Europe we lose our health insurance when we lose our jobs. We don't get guaranteed government payouts to keep us alive. Our "dole" runs out after just a few weeks and you know Congress is reluctant to extend those benefits because of the Federal Budget Deficit. Bummer, I guess we will see soup lines back in the land of the free. Cool, it will be like a living history museum. "See children. This is why FDR got us started with Medicare and Social Security. Remember his four freedoms? Want, fear, of religion and free speech." And we will stand on the sidelines and watch the starving in our midst shuffle up for soup like someone out of the 1930s.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt had this to say in his first inaugural address to the nation:
“Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men…They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers. They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish. The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths.”
Our Dear Leader says he wants the most bang for the buck when dealing with unemployment relief. Sensible I suppose but not exactly inspirational. The most bang for the buck? It's easy. The solution to unemployment is to hire people. If you give people jobs they are no longer unemployed. Let's get them working through a new Works Progress Administration. It worked for the man who spoke those inspirational words of leadership in italics above, it might well work for Mr "Bang For The Buck." Easy peasy. Let's move on to figuring how we are going to punish the financial louts that got us here. Oh what's that you say? The deficit? I know it's awful isn't it, running up debt and ruining the future and everything. Yup. Well, let's hoard our cash, kill a few more Afghans and then perhaps the unemployed will have had the decency to die of starvation like gentlemen. I mean really if we have to choose between starving Americans and the budget deficit I choose the deficit every time. No More Deficit! And if that means soup lines and starvation and no health insurance and tons of homeless everywhere so be it. Future generations will thank us.
This message brought to you by an employed American with health care and a roof over his head.
5 comments:
Wow what I can't believe is that there are no comments. Good writing there Dispatcher...
You might want to look up who started Medicare.
Gary
Gary: you're right! It never made it despite's FDR's desire to see it happen (his deathbed bill of rights makes for an interestging shopping list). What is interesting too is that when you look back to the Presidential policies enacted at the time no one now would give credit to Nixon for some of the stuff he soigned off on. Now what a difference 20 years of Reaganomics makes....
This stuff is exhausting. Much better to look at pictures! I want to keep recording how off the mark I was when I look back. With unemployment down .2 percent and only 11,000 new unemployed the stock market zooms up, gold zooms down and green shoots re-appear. Hoping it is so, but remaining doubtful.
Few remember Nixon's radical proposal for a guaranteed income for all American adults. It would've taken the place of the massive welfare-state bureaucracy, which is where the real cost of such programs lies. Of course, lotsa bureaucrats would've lost their jobs had the proposal been adopted...
I must say, Oregon gets the reasoning behind such programs, while Washington doesn't. The latter state jerks you around, while the former sends you out the door with the benefit you asked for, at least when it comes to food stamps...
__Orin
Scootin' Old Skool
It's actually a really important point. A lot of times the bureacracy is so tough to navigate potential recipients give up. Or don't know what they are entitled to.
Post a Comment