The paradox of driving the car to the beach and wondering how long before these scenes are smeared with oil did not escape me. I took Cheyenne to her favorite beach on the southern shores of Big Pine Key and we did some beach combing. She with her nose, me with the camera.
There are certain features of life in this sub tropical paradise that take adaptation, including the frequent presence of seaweed on the beaches. Not that beaches in these limestone islands in any way resemble the long sandy strands of mainland Florida, a different geologic world altogether.
Cheyenne is no water dog, in her former life, before the SPCA, I doubt she was walked, much less introduced to the joys of the water but she loves looking for things to eat in the rotting piles of seaweed. It is a fragile coastline this, in a place where land is available in only modest pieces and water permeates the landscape at every turn.
There are no hills in the Keys and a large island is one that measures perhaps five miles (8 kms)across. Tides flood and rains flood too and as we go into rainy season huge tracts of dry land will become puddles of wet mud and brown water. Houses are built on stilts as though to emphasize the transient nature of human habitation on these specks of limestone rock. I try to imagine how I shall feel if/when these watery rocks, or rocky waters are smeared irrevocably with the orange and brown sludge currently swamping a hundred miles of Louisiana's permeable coast.
My non color coordinated pink crocs are functional footwear around here and I wear them out in daily use tramping my dog on slivers of land that hover between air and water. And even though everyone knows the waters of the Keys were cleaner and crisper and more beautiful 30 years ago than they are now (as the old timers drearily drone on) I still find it hard to credit that I live where the boundary between land and sea is hard to spot. My crocs are on dry land next to water, though who can tell for sure from this picture?
I had the great good fortune to hear Nancy Klingener's Under the Sun commentary on WLRN yesterday. She used to edit Solares Hill until she quit and went to work at the college library. One can hardly blame her for seeking money and benefits, but still I think about her every Sunday when I open up the paper and wonder what she would have thought to include in the weekly magazine. She was one of those who saw things from an angle not previously seen, which seems like a wasted talent in a library as compared to an editor's chair. Her commentary on the radio reflected on the general sense of gloom and sick anticipation that permeates people's minds as they wait for a hurricane to hit, and how similar this feeling of helplessness is as we wait for the oil to arrive. I saw wildlife people on the beach taking measurements and talking on the phone and doing God knows what else.
I usually never see anybody here on a weekday afternoon during the hot rainy season we have embarked upon. But there they were "preparing" to meet the oil. Their disturbance of my stroll seemed emblematic of the future we face when/if oil lands. Everyone will be booming (incorrectly if you watched the video in this space earlier) and organizing and absorbing and the peace and quiet will be gone.
Klingener remarked on the unusual level of helplessness we all feel in the face of civil disaster approaching, unstoppable. Faced with a hurricane we try to increase the odds by putting up shutters and tucking our possessions away "somewhere safe" but faced with a deluge of oil all we can do is wonder what the hell happens next.
One wonders how the economy will do when mangroves suffocate and tourists don't want to come to just drink and look at museums in Key West.
One wonders where the pleasure will be in walking the dog on a sulphurous beach or going for a swim in oily waters.
Who will come to fish or dive? Do we all need to start thinking about alternative plans? Does a ghost town need a police department? Will parents leave and take their children someplace more salubrious? Will we need schools at all?
After Wilma in 2005 tons of people left. The flooding and fear shook the desire to live in the Keys right out of them. We got talks at work about how to cope with stress, and outbursts of anger were treated with compassion and a gathering round to help colleagues cope with endless lists of losses of things of value, of security, of certainty.
What is there to stay for in the Keys if this is gone, perhaps forever, perhaps just for decades?
We curse British Petroleum for not being able or willing to take every precaution to prevent this, and we wonder why the US Government, having learned nothing from the non response to Katrina in New Orleans seems so absent here as well. Not to mention absent in the field of regulation and oversight, but we also have to take responsibility ourselves as citizens who demand oil.
I want clean water and a decent job but I also want a gallon of gas at less than three dollars please. Right now I'd pay ten bucks a gallon to put all that oil and gas back into the earth's crust and never hear the name Deepwater Horizon again. But the cost of endless supplies of fuel are being revealed starkly to us all.
Drilling continues under the world's oceans because that is where the oil is. It's hard to get to and expensive but the easy drilling seems to be done, in large measure. That's what's meant by Peak Oil by those that understand the concept, coined decades ago and derided ever since then by "smart people." Those are the people who think cheap energy is forever, and pristine beaches and waterlines too.
There is no rule in the universe that says oceans have to be clean and livable. We can foul them up anytime we want. We have that capacity. We don't have the capacity to keep drilling for oil and producing more in places where it can be retrieved easily and out of sight. Saudi Arabia's deserts have yielded for decades and they are tired even if Saudi Aramco says Ghawar can produce for years to come. Cantarell field in Mexico's Gulf has shrunk from two million barrels a day to 700,000 and if that comes as a surprise to you, you haven't been paying attention. I'll bet you know how many women Tiger Woods has slept with though, and Tiger Wood can't stop these birds from drowning in oil.
So, in the end do we drill baby drill or not? And if not what do we do next to keep our cars and air conditioners going? I keep hearing people say "I'm no tree hugger, but..." Well perhaps it's time to embrace environmentalism as a sustainable way to live, not to reject it as "un American." There's nothing particularly patriotic about wrecking this:
I have a dream that the post Peak Oil world will actually better and more livable than the crazy pursuit of consumerism that has animated my neighbors for decades. I hope mindfulness and a rejection of the "70 percent of the economy is consuming" mentality can go out the window and be replaced with a decent home gown, home supported way of life. I wouldn't actually mind not spending another life or another dollar to blow up Afghanistan, if it comes down to it. I'd like President Wilson back, sans the racism, but with his refusal to get enmeshed in other nation's madness. We have plenty to do at home with lots of people to do it.
I haven't honestly got a clue how that can happen, so I greatly fear that a spiral of rising prices, unemployment, and corporate lying is our future portion and as long as we can't imagine a world where hugging trees is actually the sensible thing to do, then all this is at risk of evaporating before our very eyes. And we, the "consumers" demanding cheap everything, lots of it and NOW will have to shoulder our share of the blame for the greed and stupidity and unregulated rape of every single thing that isn't nailed down and dead. I lay claim to this gumbo limbo, an act about as sensible as laying claim to owning the ocean floor, BP. 

Come on down, bring your camping gear and enjoy the ocean.
The water's lovely.
17 comments:
It is so frustrating to see a disaster actually coming and be powerless to do anything about it. On the other hand, there is nothing like seeing a dog snuffling around near the water to cheer a body up.
Howard
inthedesertscootin'
"What is there to stay for in the Keys if this is gone, perhaps forever, perhaps just for decades?"
Forever? Decades? Why the pessimism?
Unless it never gets plugged, I would expect the remaining effects after two or three years to be relatively minimal. If BP's current efforts succeed, the remaining effects in six months might be hardly noticeable.
Oil companies are going after undersea deposits because that is where the oil is. More failures are bound to happen and more oil in the water means nothing good for sealife. Over fishing with modern technology, high levels of oil consumptgion and general human stupidity taking short cuts where caution should be the watchword all lead me to think there has to be a better way. Yet we have no leaders visible anywhere that can offer a way out of this self destructive pattern and alone we can recycle all we want, drive hybrids and motorcycles and compost our left overs...yet we now have a streak of oil in the gulf a hundred and fifty miles long killing eveerything in its path.
I went to Grenada on my honeymoon a decade after the US invasion and people were still going on about how dangerous the island was. One winter of oil on Keys beaches and tourism will be stone cold dead here for how long?
If you want optimism check out the tourism Development Council's website and all their maniacally grinning models
This is an evironmental Goldman Sachs, and here too BP gets away with it while our regulators take bribes.
I personally would like to be as optimistic about the impact of the spill on the Keys as Eric. Eric, please provide a link or an explanation of why you feel that way. Thanks.
One of your best posts ever, CS, and what makes this blog such a good and smart read.
BTW, in looking for somewhere to go for a couple of days, I have noticed very reduced luxury hotel prices throughout the coastline South (I didn't check Florida bec. I have state-line wanderlust again). On Memorial Day weekend? It seems the effect of the present damage, so imagine the impact in the more pessimistic view.
I consider Crocs a Florida necessity. I bought my first pair last year when I got trapped in a mall during a banging monsoon while wearing a good pair of shoes. This is when I learned about the non-slip soles and why I was able to offer valid reason for their purchase when friends decried me for not buying the "chicer" Havainas.
My Crocs (Athens model) are turd brown.
It may be that I am watching Frontline's review of the decision to go to war in Iraq (Bush's War) and everything they are talking about seemed obvious to me at the time. And still we fight this hopeless war. Does anyone else remember the food for oil program? We gave surplus corn in exchange for energy and gas cost $1,50 a gallon. The no fly zones contained Iraq, the Kurds lived in peace and no Americans died. WTF? Now Iraq is wrecked, historic treasures lost forever, 4,000+ Americans are dead, tens of thousands mutilated and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis are no freer than under Hussein because they are DEAD.
And now experts tell us not to worry about the oil and we BELIEVE them?
I am going to have to write an essay about how I used, as a schoolboy, to support the Viet Nam war. Whoops.
The item in your blog that caught my attention is the pink Crocs. Very nice. They scream KW in every way. I want some. Really.
To intertwine a previous post, "doing more with less". I have found many in the corporate world being required to "do more with less" in regards to their jobs (mostly do to boards, and shareholder greed demanding profits and thus layoffs for the bottom line).
Perhaps if we applied that mantra to our lives, we would not have to apply it to our jobs.
Perhaps, likewise, the need for this over abundance of oil would have not been needed, and this disaster would have been averted.
So the new mantra should not "be green", but rather, "do more with less - it's free"
Crocs in pink cost no more, surprisingly, than turd brown ones.
Jeffrey: every aspect of life requires buying crap to make it "work." Gardening computing sailing motorcycling etc etc...are never enough witrhout a lot of optional extras (up selling retailers call it). So it is magazines survive by advertising crap and on and on it goes.
It is the funneling effect (and cyclical effect I will touch in a second). The funneling of wealth from many to a few is pretty much what is going in the larger corporate stage (not that it hasn't been there forever, but it is accelerating).
The cyclical effect I refer to is the ground work in the 1920s and 30s with unions. All the foundation lead the way for baby boomers to get decent wages entering the market place in the 1960's (along with other factors coming out of the depression - like spending confidence).
35 years later those same baby boomers are executives looking to shunt the costs, so they break the unions, and the last cost cutting measure is labor. Eventually it implodes and you have the depression 2.0. Thus the cycle.
The next formation could be socialism, unionism again, or fascism. The US was on the verge of revolution in the 1930's, but people forget.
This is simplistic and unrefined view, I know. Yes, I am rambling now...
I have to agree with you that we are all to blame for this fiasco. Without our continual demand for the product, this problem may not exist.
We sure did not learn anything from the embargo back in the 70's. All efforts at conservation seem to have been abandoned or at least made secondary to corporate wealth.
Very nicely written post. Very thoughtful!
Is that a self-portrait of you?
If so you look like a happy man.
Then again Cheyenne may well be
holding the camera and taking the picture!
Dear Sir:
You look really different in the sixth picture.
I am definitely heading in your direction this fall. Bob Skoot is rumored to be coming in a van. But I think CPA3485 can be talked into a cross-country scooter ride.
Fondest regards,
Jack • reep • Toad
Twisted Roads
Its like some horrific sci fi movie.
I'm suffering almost as much from trying to decipher the nonsense reporting of CNN as I am from the thought of all that oil in the ocean. It was well worth it to stop by your blog and read the thoughts of a reasonable man. When this diaster was reported, one of my first thoughts was The Keys and those fragile reefs. I am not much of a praying man, but I will say one now that this all turns out okay and that next year and 5 years from now I can dive on those reefs and see them in all their glory.I'm ready for my electric car now.
Sal
It's hard not to feel doomed. Here on the Upper Left Edge every government body you can think of combines to spend upwards of a hundred grand (US$) on each and every wild salmonid hustling its way upstream to spawn and die, in hopes of reviving the species, and "dike breaching" is all the rave. No, not doing bad things to lesbians, but allowing all the stuff the Corps of Engineers built in the last milenium to rot so the water can take back the land and the itty bitty fishies will have more, better, cleaner, sexier swimming holes. The penalty for fixing a tide gate that's keeping the Mighty Columbia off your farmland is JAIL. Of course the jails are full, so empty threats along with empty promises.
Which is fine by me EXCEPT::::
Meanwhile, same federal government agencies (NOAA, Fish & Wildlife, Coast Guard, DEQ, EPA, etc., etc)allow local governments to pursue siting -- directly on the river -- such marine-environment-wrecking industries as imported LNG facilities, ship-breaking operations, biomass plants, etc.
We're lucky to be alive.
Picture 13: The fishermen appear to be watching a baby nuke test.
Cheers,
Cindy
Gas is $3.44 and the "croc-du-jour" here in Honolulu is a bright neon orange.
Battery technology is crawling along at a snail's pace - but definitely advancing. Before too long we won't need oil for anything other than lubricants, plastic and Kool Whip.
D
Post a Comment